Wednesday, October 19, 2016

ESL, EEL, but no LOL

This week readings have me thinking a lot about the programs that exist and the challenges faced by student from other countries that native language is not English. Coming to the United States for an education where English is the language of choice, already put a damper on the individual’s outlook on a good experience verses a challenge to excel at what they like and want to do.

Writing centers have a unique challenge and this challenge seem to effect students grade as well as some student’s self-esteem. As we get more involved in methods to better address student’s needs, we will start to excel at being better tutor and teachers for all. Shenandoah University decided to change their approach to working with students in the writing center due to the frustration of the student not fully learning the concepts and the tutor not fully getting the satisfaction of helping a student reach their goal. The focus was changed to have the session “the Idea Check procedure put in place. This procedure requires all ESL students make visiting the writing center a part of the process to writing papers for classes. This process would make the student feel comfortable in the environment as well as get good habits for writing. Ideas would be formulated to the structure of what would make a good or structured paper or writing assignment. The outline of what is trying to be accomplished would be the primary focus followed by a first draft of the paper that have the ideas transformed. This method proved to be effective and mostly produced ESL students with a full grade difference on an assignment they would have received a lower grade without this guidance.

I strongly agree that we have a problem with the assistance provided to student is the learning centers in regards to ESL and ELL students. Building a relationship with the student as well as helping them get the needed skills to succeed is fulfilling two fold. Inventing and correcting not at the same time to produce better growth gets the results needed and propels the student to feel comfortable and want to excel. It is I am sure an emotional challenge as well as an educational translation challenge.

Working together with student on long term papers and projects measures the improvement over a period of time and deepens the level of understanding and the acceleration of learning.  As the population of ESL and ELL students increase, it is very important to have the tutors and teachers focus on the growth of the student mentally (for confidence) and educationally, so they receive the level of education that they are looking for.


Lastly, bridging the gap between learning and relationship is important. Confidence builds learning, Learning builds confidence. The relationship between the tutor and the student builds trust. The student will believe in themselves and the methods they are learning to better themselves. The tutors will get meaningful tools and build a strong list of best practices for helping student to become not just better people, but better writers.

2 comments:

  1. I agree that it is beneficial to build relationships with ESL students. In the Come Again paper, the author spoke about how her tutee started to open up to her and etc. I think this is definetly something to consider.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agree with the idea of writing consultants working with the same ESL students over a period of time, since I believe it is very beneficial to both the tutor and the student. Over the course of time, I think the conversation becomes easier, safer, for the student to have, as I can only imagine how difficult it is to put yourself out there to a myriad of people who are completely foreign to you. I think by establishing one or two significant relationships with writing coaches, the ESL student will be at ease to speak more freely, and they can foster that collaborative air a lot better. Additionally, the coach will get to understand the student, their way of thinking, their quirks, in order to better assist them and create a teaching style that best suits the individual.

    ReplyDelete